MOVE OVER, ROMAN EMPIRE

Can America withstand the unrelenting onslaught--against, all things, Americana--that began taking SERIOUS root in this country, from the birth of the HIPPIE era, forward? Though there had been a brief resistance AGAINST the trend toward national devastation during the Nixon years; the calamity of Watergate regenerated those who would, whether wittingly or unwittingly, facilitate an eventual, internal, destruction of America. Though, during the impotent era of Jimmy Carter, that cultural contamination raged; it would be kept in check during the days of Ronald Reagan. Then, came the ignominy that was the election of Bill Clinton. Thereafter--thanks to the Left-Bent of media AND the entertainment industry--the, virtual, unthreading of the American flag became a fashionable exercise. Those banes of the HIPPIE era--that had, under Clinton, been reinvigorated--under Barack Obama became refined, and quite possibly, eternalized.

The "UNITED STATES" has DANGEROUSLY reduced FROM a united nation, into a divided one. VICIOUSLY squabbling factions of, this or that, ethnic group--or of gender or of the...genders RECLASSIFIED--are, ALL, competing and contending AGAINST the others. And; undoubtedly, this is BOUND to culminate into the destruction of a, previously, GREAT nation. The predictable, inevitable, portending outcome...requires no MASTERMIND to recognize. But, however, it DOES require a NARROWMIND to...NOT heed.        

THE MYOPIC LEFT-BENT

The political brinksmanship Left-Bent politicians are obsessed to practice is in disregard of every external threat...against the United States. Their solitary focus is in doing absolute destruction to...the presidency of Donald Trump. It is entirely perplexing; completely incomprehensible that so many of the, otherwise, well educated of that Democrat Party can be, unfortunately, so extremely ill-reasoning. They labor, exhaustively--for motives, inexplicably, bizarre--to render this president impotent before the entire world. Their endless caterwauling; their atrocious accusations and...toddler-type temper tantrums--which they will fabricate from irrelevant minutiae--would seem far more expected coming from the mouths of that coldblooded thug: Vladimir Putin or, that North Korean, lunatic, dictator: Kim Jong-un, than from American law makers of our federal government. Democrats are, unashamedly, resolved to be saboteurs to Trump's presidency, by whatever methods, accessible; no matter if the effect does sabotage to, the United States. And if you doubt that, in the least, take note of the incendiary, foul, rhetoric blast-mouthing from...Congresswoman Maxine Waters; or the cunning deception-mastery of Senator Chuck Schumer; or the, defacto, traitorous blathering of Congressman Keith Ellison; or the hyperbolic and deceit-wizardry constantly emanating from the mouth of Congressman Adam Schiff; or the stiff-neck persistence to do obstruction, on the part of Congressman John Lewis. Your labors would be in vain, if you sought to find rhetoric as blisteringly hateful from any of the aforementioned, targeted toward a foreign enemy of America, that was match-worthy to any of that these Left-Bent gasconades, on daily basis, fling ruthlessly at this American president. And so; the complexity of it all presents the question: "WHOSE SIDE, ARE THEY ON"?

Column Right: X X X = EXTRACT, EXPEL, EXILE

Column Right: X X X = EXTRACT, EXPEL, EXILE: There's an old English adage: "Desperate cures must be to desperate ills applied." For what seems ages America has, strictly a...

INCOMPATIBILITY ?

The United States--though, predominantly Christian--is a nation that spans the religious spectrum; even, some Americans are faithless or, atheistic. In America,unlike many other nations,the rights of women are equal to those of men. Included in the population are homosexuals; among them are transsexuals, transvestites; their civil rights are the equivalent of all other Americans. Recently, same-sex-marriage became legalized. Many Americans are lovers of dogs; dogs are common in near all areas of American society. With these, and a myriad of other realities, all being concomitant to America, it does seem incomprehensible that--except those who are, already, patriotic American citizens--a practicing or devout Muslim, who is a current citizen of a Muslim nation, could find America the least appealing. Why would a devout Muslim, of a Muslim nation, extend to extremes to migrate into American society, where a multitude of indications appear conclusive that, the American's way of living, their values--their habits and practices--seem not embraceable to a Muslim, dedicated to the tenets of Islam?

ATHEISM IS..."IGNORANCE"

The atheist is, a fool--and particularly, the "intellectual atheist"; they come to atheism by way of their "exceptional intelligence"--and if you doubt that, just ask them. Aside from that "brilliance of intellect", they can offer "no reference"; "no blatant or obvious proof" to which they can point, that disproves the existence of, God Almighty. Now, on the other hand, proof of God is the universe and all that is contained within it; grasping that conclusion requires no mastermind. The haughty intellectual atheist believes all that is, has "no origin"--while the believer considers all that is, and concludes, God exists. Put plainly: "God is", because "nothing else...makes sense". The atheist is--whether highly intellectual or, imbecilic--a "FOOL" (Psalms 14-1 & 53-1).

X X X = EXTRACT, EXPEL, EXILE

There's an old English adage: "Desperate cures must be to desperate ills applied." For what seems ages America has, strictly and obligatorily, charged society with the responsibility of reforming, rehabilitating, or otherwise correcting violent, felonious, offenders--to include even those who have been, recidivist violent felons. People have been made to believe that the concept of incarceration, as "punishment", is somehow "inhumane". Society has become persuaded that dangerous, recidivist, felons had gone wayward owing to some circumstance of societal lack of compassion, negligence, or merciless disregard; which seems to fault the law abiding, for the felonious violent crimes committed by, lawbreakers. The nation has nearly two million incarcerated in the federal prison system, reportedly, at an annual cost to taxpayers of from $20,000 to $28,000, per inmate.

In Chicago, in 1924, two homosexuals in their twenties committed the "thrill-kill" murder of 14-year-old Robert Franks to demonstrate their intellectual superiority in being able to commit the "perfect crime". It was, then, called the "crime of the century". Ten years later(1934), yet another "crime of the century" would eclipse the Franks homicide; the toddler child of American aviator Charles Lindberg was kidnapped and murdered by Bruno Hauptman. Those two murders would be major topics in crime for more than thirty years;if committed today, within weeks if not days, both would have vanished from public recollection. Since the mid-1960's on, America has been increasingly compelled to experience horrors in the ways of murder by terror,senseless murder committed by serial killers, murderers who kill and cannibalize; killers who murder, then dismember their victims,scattering body parts across large areas. Society has reduced to becoming familiarized with the utter madness of contract-killing, thrill-killing, murder via so called: "gang-banging", multiple murders committed by cults; murders committed in mass in public schools, movie complexes, and a myriad of other diverse outrages. Heinous acts of murder now occur so frequently, that--whereas in times-past, Americans might have been aghast into disbelief--today, many such homicides seem so routine, they may not even reach the level of being considered national news. The wickedness in which the slaughter of human beings occur today, becomes forgotten, because of those worse heinous committed, tomorrow; and, so on.

I have believed, since the 1970's,that America needs to undertake a system of..."Criminal Exile". Recidivist, violent, felons--murderers sentenced to life, those currently on death row--ought to be given an option: they could continue on death row until executed; they could continue serving their life sentence: or, they could take the option of being exiled. Once banished, there could be "no appeal" thereafter; it would be "permanent". Exile could be imposed by the courts either at sentencing, or even afterward the convicted could, through the court, opt for exile. Those of society who oppose capital punishment, it would seem, ought to find banishment an acceptable alloy. In time--given the slaughter madness practiced by terrorist groups across the globe, against free societies--it would be more than reasonable if Western Democracies united in a common practice of permanently banishing uncivilized killers to a consolidated location on the planet, where there they would be compelled to coexist with those of their own ilk.

A FOOLISH NOTION

If the GOP gentry seriously want Jeb Bush to become president, they're beguiling themselves. While he'd be an enormous improvement over the incumbent, that alone says little; most any Republican would be. Two terms of Obama's "left-bent" tumult requires far more of a conservative remedy than will be found in Jeb Bush. Also, cultivating in the minds of voters acceptance of high elected offices becoming routinely rotated within certain families goes counter-wise to our founding concepts. The dynastic Kennedy permeation ought to have taught that lesson. Also, both Bush presidents allowed political opponents --including "left-bent" media--to endlessly slander them with despicably outrageous accusations, without response. Congressman Barney Frank (who once accused G.W. of plotting genocide: "ethnic cleansing by hurricane") once said (September, 2010): "if you blame or accuse someone over and over of something bad and the accusation is never responded to, the accusation becomes believed". Against the Bush presidents, Frank--and his "left-bent" cohorts in government and media--were committed, prolific, practitioners of that doctrine. Jeb Bush would be just as susceptible to likewise attack--as had been his brother and dad--and for the same reason: not responding, believing it beneath the office of president to defend themselves. Regarding President G.W. Bush, he was not our greatest president--but hardly had he been our worst; nothing justifies the cascade of hatred dealt him by the "left-bent". Unfortunately, his choice to not respond, was contributory to the unfairness that victimized him. The GOP nominating Jeb Bush would be terribly bad strategy.