IRRESPONSIBLE PARENTING, Part III

Any woman subjecting to becoming impregnated by a man--"she knows before hand", to be a deadbeat dad who has, unashamedly, fathered multiple children by multiple women and, has been negligent regarding all his responsibilities as a father--"extremely debases herself". She also risks that her child could suffer encumbrances of having to grow up without the advantages of a responsible father; and unless she is of financial means, there is, too, the likelihood that her thoughtlessness could result in the responsibilities for financial support of that child being dumped onto the shoulders of others (society) who bore, no responsibility or involvement in the conception of, that child. The number of fathers who commit this woeful evil, against their own children, seems infinite and society seems to have become accustom to this callous practice with a disposition of, near tolerance of it. There are men having the inglorious reputation of fathering beyond a score of children and, by multiple women. A certain level of the most grotesque character is prerequisite, on the part of men who can lie down at night with a full stomach and sleep in blissful oblivion, entirely unconcerned about the welfare of children "they" caused to be born and then, had coldbloodedly abandoned. Trifling, negligent men who try evading their "natural and moral" obligation to dutifully apply themselves to all aspects of responsible fatherhood are heartless hindrances to a well-comported society. They are impediment nuisances, burdensome drags, unprincipled and ignominious parasites, who turn their backs on reponsibilities to children "they" caused to be born. They take as weakness, and then exploit, the goodwill of others (society) who take up the slack to support "their" children. If an able-bodied man were to present himself at your doorstep, with his multiple offsring at his side (each of which born to a different mother) and said to you that he needed to get on with his life; that "his" children impeded that need and therefore, he was dumping into "your" lap, all of "his" parental responsibilities; how, would you respond? Father-creatures or, deadbeat dads,whose children are supported by public largess are doing, in tantamount, precisely that.

IRRESPONSIBLE PARENTING, Part II

The young Austrailian baseball athlete who was recently shot dead, "on a whim", by one of a trio of teen-aged monsters, had been victimized by both the three thugs and, their irresponsible parents. However; thus far, the uncivilized killing-trio only, will be held accountable for this utterly monstrous slaughter and not, as well, their apparently dangerously derelict parents. "Foolishness," it reads in Proverbs (22-15), "is bound in the heart of a child; but the rod of correction shall drive it far from them". Parents who raise their kids, deliberately, neglectful--not, dutifully, addressing socially unacceptable conduct that, if not corrected can, as the child matures, manifest in criminal ways, detrimental to the innocent public--are contributory to, responsible and "absolutely" blameworthy for, whatever feloniously violent acts their undisciplined offspring may come to commit against society. Quite often derelict parents, raising undisciplined children, explain their actions saying, kids have only one time to be a child and, because they so love them, they refuse to spoil their childhood by not allowing that they be free to to grow up without being constantly corrected, admonished or told, no. That kind of thinking is a seed that develops rotten character and, is threatening to peaceful society. As I get along, I will reference many examples of society having suffered, destructively, as a result of woefully irresponsible and even, stupid, parenting.

BLACK-LEADER-CLIQUE

There seems a presumption (on the part of a good many black Americans, apparently) that a "clique-cadre" of, self-appointed, blacks are somehow ordained to act and speak(and otherwise represent)on behalf of all black America. That concept ought to be extremely offensive to black people; definitely it acutely offends, "this black man". Here's a bright idea: Why shouldn't blacks do their own thinking and represent themselves,as individuals? Why must all blacks obediently acquiesce to opinions and pronouncements "assigned them" by that "clique-cadre"? One reason gullible blacks, in near reverence, act in "me-too" manner to those pronouncements and points of view "assigned them" by that "clique-cadre", is due to their morbid fear of being smeared an "uncle-Tom" if, they do not.